Designing a Capstone Project: Build a Local Policy Brief Using a Mayor’s Media Appearance

Turn a Mayor’s TV Moment into a High-Impact Capstone: A Practical Guide for Students and Teachers

Hook: Students and instructors often struggle to design capstones that connect classroom research to real civic outcomes: where do you start, how do you interview busy stakeholders, and how do you turn messy evidence into a one-page policy brief and a persuasive public presentation? This guide walks you through a ready-to-run capstone that begins with a mayor’s national TV appearance (think Zohran Mamdani on ABC’s The View) and ends with a professional policy brief, stakeholder outreach, and a public-facing presentation.

Why this capstone matters in 2026

In 2026, civic engagement curricula and experiential learning programs increasingly prioritize local impact, rapid-response policy analysis, and public communication. National media appearances by mayors — like Zohran Mamdani’s 2025 TV spots — amplify local issues to a national audience and create teachable moments for students to:

• Practice real-world research methods using open city data and federal datasets
• Conduct and analyze stakeholder interviews under real time constraints
• Produce a concise, evidence-based policy brief targeted at local decision-makers
• Hone public speaking and presentation skills for hybrid audiences

Recent trends to keep in mind: municipal open data portals matured through late 2025, AI-assisted literature review and data visualization tools became classroom staples, and civic tech platforms now support direct engagement between students and city offices. These trends make it easier — and more urgent — to train students in practical, ethical policy communication.

Project overview: deliverables, timeline, and learning goals

Core deliverables

• Policy brief (2–4 pages; 1-page executive summary)
• Annotated bibliography & data appendix
• Stakeholder interview summaries (with consent forms or IRB exemption notes)
• 10–12 slide presentation + 5-minute recorded pitch
• Reflective memo on methods, ethical issues, and next steps

8–10 week sample timeline (scaffolded for classes)

1. Week 1: Watch the mayor’s TV segment, frame the problem, form teams
2. Week 2: Define research question(s); map stakeholders
3. Week 3–4: Secondary research (open data, budget documents, news), initial data pulls
4. Week 5: Design interview guides; secure stakeholders; practice ethics/consent
5. Week 6: Conduct interviews, transcribe and code responses
6. Week 7: Draft policy brief and recommendations; get peer feedback
7. Week 8: Finalize brief; build slides; rehearse public speaking and Q&A
8. Optional Weeks 9–10: community presentation or simulated press briefing

Step 1 — Frame the response: from a TV soundbite to a research question

Start by watching the mayor’s media appearance closely. Ask: what claim did the mayor make that has local policy implications? Example claims might include threats to federal funding, proposals to change public safety resources, or new housing initiatives. Use the mayor’s remarks as the policy prompt, then convert that into a tight research question.

Good research questions are specific and actionable. Examples:

• “If federal funds are reduced, which city programs are most at risk and what contingency options exist?”
• “How would a proposed 10% increase in summer youth employment impact local crime indicators over one year?”
• “What local zoning reforms could increase affordable housing supply within two years?”

Step 2 — Research methods: mixing quantitative and qualitative evidence

Capstones that influence local decision-making need both numbers and context. Use a mixed-methods approach:

Quantitative sources & tools

• Local open data portals (city budget, 311 calls, crime data, permitting)
• Federal datasets: American Community Survey (ACS), Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
• School district and public health dashboards
• Tools: Google Sheets, R / Python for analysis, and AI-assisted data-cleaning tools (use with verification)

Qualitative sources & methods

• News reports and mayoral transcripts (start with the TV transcript)
• Stakeholder interviews (residents, community leaders, city officials, NGO staff)
• Document analysis: meeting minutes, program evaluations, city memos

Tip: Use reproducible methods. Keep a data appendix with raw queries, code snippets, and dataset versions so your results can be verified by a local official or future students. Consider running lightweight, reproducible models on local tools like a classroom LLM lab (local LLM setups) when testing summarization workflows.

Step 3 — Stakeholder interviews: map, recruit, and analyze

Interviews turn abstract evidence into grounded insight. Follow a simple but rigorous process:

1. Map stakeholders

Identify groups who will be directly affected or who hold implementation power: city budget staff, council members, community boards, non-profit leaders, municipal unions, and residents. Create a prioritization matrix: influence vs. affectedness.

2. Recruit strategically

• Start with public affairs or press contacts at city hall — they can direct you to the right office.
• Use concise outreach messages: subject line, one-sentence project summary, ask (10–20 min interview), and availability window.
• Be flexible: offer phone, Zoom, or in-person options and explain how you’ll use and cite the interview.

3. Prepare an interview guide

Keep questions neutral and open-ended. Example guide (10–12 questions):

• Can you describe how [policy area] has changed in recent years?
• What are the top three constraints your office faces when implementing programs related to this issue?
• If federal funding were reduced by X, which programs would be prioritized?
• Which quantitative indicators do you track to measure success?
• Who else should we talk to?

4. Consent & ethics

Always obtain consent, and clarify whether the interview is on or off the record. For class projects, complete a simple consent form and store anonymized transcripts for public deliverables. If your institution requires IRB review, start the process early — and consult privacy checklists when recordings or personal data are involved (protecting client privacy when using AI tools).

5. Analyze interviews

Code themes across interviews (common constraints, suggested solutions, political feasibility). Use direct quotes sparingly in the brief; attribute them carefully.

Step 4 — Writing a concise, persuasive policy brief

A policy brief must be short, clear, and oriented to decisions. Aim for 2–4 pages; include a 1-page executive summary. Use headings and visuals for scannability. Here's a structure that works:

Policy brief structure

1. Title — one line, includes the policy question
2. Executive summary — one paragraph + 3 bullet recommendations (boxed)
3. Context & stakes — 2–3 paragraphs summarizing the mayor’s claim and local implications
4. Evidence & analysis — concise data tables, one chart, and interview-based insights
5. Recommendations — 3 options (quick wins, medium-term, long-term) with costs and responsible actors
6. Implementation timeline & metrics — 6–12 month milestones and KPIs
7. Appendix & data sources

Executive summary template (one-page)

Problem: One sentence identifying the issue raised by the mayor’s appearance.

Key finding: One sentence summarizing the most compelling evidence (e.g., funding gap, trend, or stakeholder consensus).

Top recommendation: One sentence describing the recommended policy action.

Impact: One sentence on expected outcomes and a 6–12 month metric.

Use cost estimates where possible (ballpark figures are fine if you explain assumptions). Decision-makers appreciate clear trade-offs and operational details; for class projects that add financial modeling, look to small-business resilience playbooks for budgeting ideas like micro-subscriptions and cash resilience.

Step 5 — Presentation & public speaking: make it memorable

Many students underestimate the importance of delivery. A strong brief with weak presentation loses impact. Create a 10–12 slide deck and rehearse a 5–10 minute pitch. Key advice:

Slide structure (10 slides)

1. Title & team
2. One-sentence problem statement
3. Why it matters now (link to mayor’s TV remarks)
4. Key evidence (one chart)
5. Stakeholder perspectives (2–3 quotes paraphrased)
6. Top recommendation
7. Implementation steps & timeline
8. Costs & trade-offs
9. How success will be measured
10. Ask: what you want the audience to do next

Public speaking tips

• Open with the human stake — a 15-second story or resident quote
• Use the rule of three: three evidence points, three recommendations
• Practice with time constraints — record yourself and trim to essentials
• Anticipate tough questions and prepare 30–60 second responses
• Run a mock press conference with hostile questions (assign roles to classmates)

Plan your outreach and promotion — a public-facing presentation or press briefing can trigger local media coverage and real-time discovery.

Assessment: grading rubric and success criteria

Make expectations explicit. A sample rubric (100 points):

• Research rigor & data accuracy — 30 pts
• Stakeholder engagement & ethical conduct — 20 pts
• Quality of the policy brief (clarity, feasibility) — 20 pts
• Presentation & public speaking — 20 pts
• Reflection & reproducibility (appendix, code) — 10 pts

Provide formative feedback at the draft stage. Encourage peer review to improve clarity and political sensitivity.

Practical classroom adaptations and extensions

For high school classes: shorten timeline to 4–6 weeks, use scaffolded worksheets, and require only 1–2 stakeholder interviews (community organizations and residents).

For undergraduate capstones: require quantitative analysis with reproducible code and at least three interviews across sectors. Use a shared repository or lightweight document management process for consent forms and draft versions (GitHub or institutional drive).

For graduate students or policy labs: add budget modeling, FOIA research, and a real-world meeting with a council member or agency official to present recommendations.

Case study: framing a response to a mayoral TV claim

Use Zohran Mamdani’s media attention as a classroom prompt: during his 2025 appearances, the mayor addressed funding risks and city priorities. A student team could build a capstone that asks: if federal funding is uncertain, what immediate budgetary risks exist for critical social services?

Steps the team would follow:

1. Pull the city’s budget baseline for the current fiscal year (open data)
2. Identify programs most dependent on federal grants (e.g., housing vouchers, public health grants)
3. Interview program managers to understand contingency plans
4. Estimate shortfalls and recommend reallocation or bridging strategies (e.g., rainy-day funds, philanthropic partnerships)
5. Present a 6-month action plan with measurable KPIs

This type of focused, time-bound work is exactly what local officials need in 2026: quick-turn analysis grounded in evidence and community voice.

Ethics, consent, and AI: guardrails for student projects

Two ethical areas deserve attention:

• Human subjects: obtain consent, anonymize sensitive data, and follow any institutional review requirements.
• AI tools: AI-assisted data-cleaning tools and generative AI can accelerate drafting and summarization but verify facts, cite original sources, and disclose AI use in appendices.

Keep a clear audit trail: who you interviewed, when, and how quotes are used. This builds trust with local partners and protects students and institutions. When planning community-facing deliverables, consider smaller outreach formats like micro-clinics or neighborhood showcases (micro-markets) for practice runs.

Tools, data sources, and templates

Practical resources to recommend to students:

• City open data portal (budget, 311, permitting)
• American Community Survey (IPUMS or data.census.gov)
• Local government budget documents (PDFs often on the finance department site)
• Transcription tools (Otter.ai or institutional alternatives) — verify against recording
• Visualization: Flourish, Datawrapper, or Tableau Public for clean charts
• Collaborative writing: Google Docs + a shared repository for datasets (GitHub or institutional drive)

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Pitfall: Broad or vague research question. Fix: Narrow to a specific program, metric, or timeline.
• Pitfall: Over-reliance on AI summaries. Fix: Cross-check AI outputs against primary sources and cite originals (developer guides on AI training best practices).
• Pitfall: No stakeholder buy-in. Fix: Invite at least one stakeholder to review recommendations before finalizing.
• Pitfall: Data errors. Fix: Use reproducible code and include a data appendix with sources and extraction dates.

Teacher toolkit: rubrics, consent form language, and lesson plan snippets

Provide students with the following ready-to-use items:

• Consent form template: project description, recording consent, use of quotes, opt-out option
• Interview grading rubric: clarity, ethics, follow-up, and transcription accuracy
• One-page lesson plan for the first week: watch the mayor’s segment, identify policy prompts, form teams

Final checklist before public presentation

• Is the executive summary one page and focused?
• Are data sources cited and included in the appendix?
• Have interviewees approved or clarified how quotes are used?
• Does the presentation answer: What? Why now? Who’s responsible? How much will it cost?
• Have you rehearsed difficult questions and a 30-second answer to the mayor’s claim?

Takeaways: what students will learn

• Applied research methods: moving from a media prompt to evidence-based recommendations
• Civic engagement: accountable public-facing deliverables that can influence local decisions
• Public communication: crisp executive summaries and confident public speaking
• Ethical practice: consent, transparency, and responsible AI use

In short: this capstone builds a bridge between classroom learning and real-world civic decision-making — preparing students to be both critical analysts and persuasive communicators.

Call to action

Ready to run this capstone in your class or club? Start by organizing a watch party for the mayor’s latest media appearance, download the one-page executive summary template, and schedule stakeholder outreach in week 2. Share your policy brief with local officials and invite feedback — then bring that feedback into your final presentation. If you try this project, share a summary or uploaded brief with the tutors.news community so other educators and students can learn from your experience.

Related Reading

• Edge Signals, Live Events, and the 2026 SERP — on real-time discovery and live presentations
• Developer Guide: Offering Your Content as Compliant Training Data — practices for AI-assisted research
• Should Local Cultural Institutions Take a Political Stand? — guidance on political sensitivity
• Brand Safety Playbook: Use Account-Level Exclusions and PR Signals to Improve SERP Perception
• Cheap Custom Merch: Best VistaPrint Alternatives When Codes Don’t Work
• The Ultimate Winter Cozy Edit: 12 Hot-Water Bottles and Microwavable Alternatives Curated for Makers
• How phasing out big-brand operations affects local fragrance availability: a retail playbook
• Prompting Ethics: How to Train Safer Models After High-Profile Deepfake Lawsuits